La filosofía neoescolástica en la formación de psicólogos argentinos. el caso de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, sede San Luis: 1958-1966
|
Descargar SCORM
Este recurso ha sido solicitado 2 veces (0 veces en los últimos 31 días).
Para poder solicitar este recurso debe identificarse como usuario de la biblioteca
|
| |
Ver
Detalles del recurso
|
|
|
La filosofía neoescolástica en la formación de psicólogos argentinos. el caso de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, sede San Luis: 1958-1966
|
| Id. |
2066309 |
| Idioma |
spa
|
| Titulo |
La filosofía neoescolástica en la formación de psicólogos argentinos. el caso de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, sede San Luis: 1958-1966 |
| Autor(es) |
Piñeda, María Andrea
|
| Localización |
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=1272961
(Revista) ISSN 1515-4467
|
| Versión |
1.0 |
| Estado |
Final
|
| Descripción |
After the 1st Argentine Congress of Psychology held in Tucumán in 1954, the first undergraduated programs of Psychology in Argentina were organized. The National University of Cuyo created such a program in San Luis, in 1958. This work analyses the first undergraduated program of Psychology with the aim of researching the possible influence of the neoescholastic philosophy, and specially neothomism ¿one of its main trends- in the background of the teachers of the first psychologists graduated at the Faculty of Sciences of the National University of Cuyo. The Neoscholastic, and Neothomism, had been born as european philosophical schools by the end of the XIXth century, significantly growing up by the begining of the XXth. In Argentina, it was receptioned at the same age, mainly spreading out its influence in the 30¿s and 40¿s, when the works of outstanding figures such as Maritain ¿who came to Argentina several times and published at many national journals-, or Agostino Gemelli, who took part of the First National Congress of Philosophy, and the First Argentine Congress of Psychology. To analyse the present program of studies we have selected the philosophical subjects (Introduction to Psychology, Logic and Theory of Knowledge, Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, Ethics) and the geneneral subjects on psychology (Psychology I and Psychology II) with the asumption that they set the discipline basis and let us know the paradigms in which Psychology was conceived. We made a sociobibliometrical study of the programs of studies of each of these subjects, by analyzing the references used. We also analyzed the teachers profile by their curriculum vitae, and made use of oral sources when it was possible for us to find out. We confirmed that the neoscholastic philosophy had such as an important influence to the background of the teachers involeved in this first program of Psychology, as we initialy hipothesized.
|
| Tipo |
application/pdf
|
| Tipo de recurso |
text (article)
|
| Tipo de Interactividad |
Expositivo
|
| Nivel de Interactividad |
muy bajo
|
| Audiencia |
Estudiante
Profesor
Autor
|
| Estructura |
Atomic |
| Coste |
no
|
| Copyright |
sí
|
|
free |
| Formatos |
application/pdf
|
| Requerimientos técnicos |
Browser: Any
|
| Relación |
[IsBasedOn] Fundamentos en humanidades, ISSN 1515-4467, Nº. 7-8, 2003, pags. 79-102
|
| Fecha de contribución |
24-jun-2009 |
| Contacto |
|
|
|
|
|
Valoración de los usuarios
neoescolastica, Sep 23, 2009 4:43:56 PM
caceres, alejandro
me viene al pelo el que busca encuentra, me viene al pelo para tener mas claridad con respecto a este tema, hay muchos chicos que desconocen estos sitios, y viene rebien cuando los tiempos apremian y hay que rendir una mesa, lo digo por experiencia, gracias, sigaN asi.
|
| |
Valore este recurso. Escriba un comentario y comparta sus impresiones con el resto de usuarios.
|
|
|
|
