Resource data
Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York
Location:
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York (2001) Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews. CRD Report ( 4 (2nd Edition)). NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination , York, UK. ISBN 1 900640 20 1
In this document, the framework for carrying out systematic
reviews is described in three stages: planning, reviewing and
disseminating. The need for a review should be established
before commissioning or commencing review work. The
methodology of the review should be documented and working
arrangements should be put in place to ensure that the
methods can be followed. Finally, there should be a strategy
for putting together a report of the review and disseminating
its findings to relevant audiences, and if possible, updating the
review.
The stages of a review and the phases within them are
described consecutively. However, this chronology may vary
during the review. It will not always be possible to complete
one phase before another has to be started, and sometimes it
will be more efficient to work on several phases
simultaneously.
It is essential that good communication is maintained between
those commissioning or supervising the review and those
carrying it out. To aid the process, this framework includes
agendas for some joint meetings. These meetings help set a
timetable and ensure that the review work receives the
required direction and support. The number of meetings and
their schedule may have to be tailored to suit the requirements
of a given review.
The content of this report draws on information from several
sources. All the steps necessary to undertake a systematic
review have been listed, but it is not possible to provide
definitive advice on all of the methods. This is because the
science of systematically reviewing the literature is relatively
young, and many methodological issues are still being
explored. Therefore this guidance is to assist those conducting
reviews to reach a minimum standard based on the
understanding of the subject at the time of writing. Reviewers
wishing to obtain up-to-date information in this area should
look at the Cochrane Methodology Database and systematic
reviews of empirical methodological research in the Cochrane
Library. New advice is incorporated in updates of the
Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook (URL: http://www.updatesoftware.
com/ccweb/cochrane/hbook.htm) and the ‘Resources
available at the CRD’ web site (URL: http://
www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/).
Belongs to: White Rose Research Online
Descargar SCORM
¡Sea el primero en solicitar este recurso!
Para poder solicitar este recurso debe identificarse como usuario de la biblioteca
Users rating
No hay ninguna valoración para este recurso. Sea el primero en
valorar este recurso.
Detalles del recurso
|
Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews
|
| Id. |
34469595 |
| Titulo |
Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews |
| Autor(es) |
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York |
| Location |
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York (2001) Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews. CRD Report ( 4 (2nd Edition)). NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination , York, UK. ISBN 1 900640 20 1
|
| Versión |
1.0 |
| Estado |
Final
|
| Descripción |
In this document, the framework for carrying out systematic
reviews is described in three stages: planning, reviewing and
disseminating. The need for a review should be established
before commissioning or commencing review work. The
methodology of the review should be documented and working
arrangements should be put in place to ensure that the
methods can be followed. Finally, there should be a strategy
for putting together a report of the review and disseminating
its findings to relevant audiences, and if possible, updating the
review.
The stages of a review and the phases within them are
described consecutively. However, this chronology may vary
during the review. It will not always be possible to complete
one phase before another has to be started, and sometimes it
will be more efficient to work on several phases
simultaneously.
It is essential that good communication is maintained between
those commissioning or supervising the review and those
carrying it out. To aid the process, this framework includes
agendas for some joint meetings. These meetings help set a
timetable and ensure that the review work receives the
required direction and support. The number of meetings and
their schedule may have to be tailored to suit the requirements
of a given review.
The content of this report draws on information from several
sources. All the steps necessary to undertake a systematic
review have been listed, but it is not possible to provide
definitive advice on all of the methods. This is because the
science of systematically reviewing the literature is relatively
young, and many methodological issues are still being
explored. Therefore this guidance is to assist those conducting
reviews to reach a minimum standard based on the
understanding of the subject at the time of writing. Reviewers
wishing to obtain up-to-date information in this area should
look at the Cochrane Methodology Database and systematic
reviews of empirical methodological research in the Cochrane
Library. New advice is incorporated in updates of the
Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook (URL: http://www.updatesoftware.
com/ccweb/cochrane/hbook.htm) and the ‘Resources
available at the CRD’ web site (URL: http://
www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/). |
| Tipo de recurso |
Book
PeerReviewed
|
| Tipo de Interactividad |
Expositivo
|
| Nivel de Interactividad |
muy bajo
|
| Audiencia |
Estudiante
Profesor
Autor
|
| Estructura |
Atomic |
| Coste |
no
|
| Copyright |
sí
|
| Requerimientos técnicos |
Browser: Any |
| Relación |
[References] http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm
[References] http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/1139/
|
| Fecha de contribución |
02-may-2008 |
| Contacto |
|
|
|
|