Publicidad

Publicidad

becas.universia.netBiblioteca.Net

Buscar recursos:

Buscador Google

Estimation of Pig Fecal Contamination in a River Catchment by Real-Time PCR Using Two Pig-Specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA Genetic Markers

Descargar SCORM

Este recurso ha sido solicitado 1 veces (0 veces en los últimos 31 días).

Para poder solicitar este recurso debe identificarse como usuario de la biblioteca

 
Ver

Detalles del recurso

Marcadores Sociales
Estimation of Pig Fecal Contamination in a River Catchment by Real-Time PCR Using Two Pig-Specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA Genetic Markers
Id. 45180335
Idioma inglés
Titulo Estimation of Pig Fecal Contamination in a River Catchment by Real-Time PCR Using Two Pig-Specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA Genetic Markers
Autor(es) MIESZKIN, Sophie
Furet, Jean-Pierre
Corthier, Gerard
GOURMELON, Michele
Localización http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/notice/2009/notice6493-EN.htm
http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/doc/2009/publication-6493.pdf
DOI:10.1128/AEM.02343-08
Versión 1.0
Estado Final
Descripción The microbiological quality of coastal or river water can be affected by fecal contamination from human or animal sources. To discriminate pig fecal pollution from other pollution, a library-independent microbial source tracking method targeting Bacteroidales host-specific 16S rRNA gene markers by real-time PCR was designed. Two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers (Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac) were designed using 16S rRNA gene Bacteroidales clone libraries from pig feces and slurry. For these two pig markers, 98 to 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity were obtained when tested by TaqMan real-time PCR. A decrease in the concentrations of Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac markers was observed throughout the slurry treatment chain. The two newly designed pig-specific Bacteroidales markers, plus the human-specific (HF183) and ruminant-specific (BacR) Bacteroidales markers, were then applied to river water samples (n = 24) representing 14 different sites from the French Daoulas River catchment (Brittany, France). Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac were quantified in 25% and 62.5%, respectively, of samples collected around pig farms, with concentrations ranging from 3.6 to 4.1 log10 copies per 100 ml of water. They were detected in water samples collected downstream from pig farms but never detected near cattle farms. HF183 was quantified in 90% of water samples collected downstream near Daoulas town, with concentrations ranging between 3.6 and 4.4 log10 copies per 100 ml of water, and BacR in all water samples collected around cattle farms, with concentrations ranging between 4.6 and 6.0 log10 copies per 100 ml of water. The results of this study highlight that pig fecal contamination was not as frequent as human or bovine fecal contamination and that fecal pollution generally came from multiple origins. The two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers can be applied to environmental water samples to detect pig fecal pollution.
Tipo application/pdf
Tipo de recurso Texto Narrativo
Tipo de Interactividad Expositivo
Nivel de Interactividad muy bajo
Audiencia Estudiante
Profesor
Autor
Estructura Atomic
Coste no
Copyright
2009 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved
Formatos application/pdf
Requerimientos técnicos Browser: Any
Relación [IsBasedOn] Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009/05, Volume 75, Issue 10, Pages 3045-3054
Fecha de contribución 04-jul-2009
Contacto

Valoración de los usuarios

No hay ninguna valoración para este recurso. Sea el primero en valorar este recurso.