Resource data
Estimating the Restoration and Modernization Costs of Infrastructure and Facilities
Lufkin, Peter Desai, Anand Janke, Jay
Location:
http://hdl.handle.net/1811/435
Under spending for the maintenance of public facilities and infrastructure is a well-known issue. At least part of the problem can be attributed to our poor understanding of precisely what funding is required. Methodological limitations diminish the credibility of budget estimates that, for many agencies, are based on ad hoc approximations or historical trends. Estimates based on physical inspections are more defensible, but are expensive and more useful for defining remedial projects than estimating future budget requirements.
Carefully defining facility restoration and modernization (R&M) requirements yields a collection of determinants—including obsolescence, changing uses, and extraordinary damage—closely related to the concept of economic depreciation. Once this link is made, the methods of economic capital theory are available for understanding R&M needs. More specifically, R&M costs can be estimated using depreciation rates, an approach useful for any large organization requiring credible R&M cost estimates, but unable to bear the costs of frequent physical inspections.
Belongs to: The KnowledgeBank at OSU
Descargar SCORM
¡Sea el primero en solicitar este recurso!
Para poder solicitar este recurso debe identificarse como usuario de la biblioteca
Users rating
No hay ninguna valoración para este recurso. Sea el primero en
valorar este recurso.
Detalles del recurso
|
Estimating the Restoration and Modernization Costs of Infrastructure and Facilities
|
| Id. |
4605224 |
| Idioma |
inglés (Estados Unidos)
|
| Titulo |
Estimating the Restoration and Modernization Costs of Infrastructure and Facilities |
| Autor(es) |
Lufkin, Peter Desai, Anand Janke, Jay |
| Location |
http://hdl.handle.net/1811/435
|
| Versión |
1.0 |
| Estado |
Final
|
| Descripción |
Under spending for the maintenance of public facilities and infrastructure is a well-known issue. At least part of the problem can be attributed to our poor understanding of precisely what funding is required. Methodological limitations diminish the credibility of budget estimates that, for many agencies, are based on ad hoc approximations or historical trends. Estimates based on physical inspections are more defensible, but are expensive and more useful for defining remedial projects than estimating future budget requirements.
Carefully defining facility restoration and modernization (R&M) requirements yields a collection of determinants—including obsolescence, changing uses, and extraordinary damage—closely related to the concept of economic depreciation. Once this link is made, the methods of economic capital theory are available for understanding R&M needs. More specifically, R&M costs can be estimated using depreciation rates, an approach useful for any large organization requiring credible R&M cost estimates, but unable to bear the costs of frequent physical inspections. |
| Tipo |
191727 bytes application/pdf |
| Palabras clave |
depreciation |
| Tipo de recurso |
Working Paper
|
| Tipo de Interactividad |
Expositivo
|
| Nivel de Interactividad |
muy bajo
|
| Audiencia |
Estudiante
Profesor
Autor
|
| Estructura |
Atomic |
| Coste |
no
|
| Copyright |
sí
|
| Formatos |
191727 bytes application/pdf |
| Requerimientos técnicos |
Browser: Any |
| Relación |
[References] Working paper series (Ohio State University. John Glenn Institute for Public Service and Public Policy and School of Public Policy and Management;2005-2
|
| Fecha de contribución |
29-oct-2006 |
| Contacto |
|
|