Field evaluation of micropropagated and conventionally propagated ginger in subtropical Queensland
|
Descargar SCORM
Este recurso ha sido solicitado 1 veces (0 veces en los últimos 31 días).
Para poder solicitar este recurso debe identificarse como usuario de la biblioteca
|
| |
Ver
Detalles del recurso
|
|
|
Field evaluation of micropropagated and conventionally propagated ginger in subtropical Queensland
|
| Id. |
47047875 |
| Titulo |
Field evaluation of micropropagated and conventionally propagated ginger in subtropical Queensland |
| Autor(es) |
Smith, M.K.
Hamill, S.D.
|
| Localización |
Smith, M.K. and Hamill, S.D. (1996) Field evaluation of micropropagated and conventionally propagated ginger in subtropical Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 36 (3). pp. 347-354.
http://era.deedi.qld.gov.au/694/
|
| Versión |
1.0 |
| Estado |
Final
|
| Descripción |
The growth and performance of micropropagated ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe)was compared with 'seed'-derived plants in field trials conducted in south-eastern Queensland. In the first generation ex vitro, micropropagated plants had significantly (P<0.01) reduced rhizome yield with smaller knobs and more roots. Micropropagated plants had a greater (P<0.01) shoot: root (rhizome) ratio compared with seed-derived plants. Shoots from micropropagated plants were also significantly (P<0.01) smaller with a greater number of shoots per plant. The unusual shoot morphology of the micropropagated plants did not appear to be related to the presence of benzylaminopurine, a plant growth hormone added to the multiplication medium, as plants subcultured for 3 cycles on a hormone-free medium also exhibited similar characteristics. Seed collected from the micropropagated plants and seed-derived plants was harvested and, despite the micropropagated seed being significantly (P<0.01) smaller, by the second generation ex vitro there were no significant differences between the treatments. Factors that can improve rhizome size, while reducing production costs, need to be identified before micropropagated plants can be recommended for routine use in the ginger industry as a source of disease and pest-free planting material.
|
| Tipo |
application/pdf
|
| Palabras clave |
Horticulture. Horticultural crops
|
| Tipo de recurso |
journal article
|
| Tipo de Interactividad |
Expositivo
|
| Nivel de Interactividad |
muy bajo
|
| Audiencia |
Estudiante
Profesor
Autor
|
| Estructura |
Atomic |
| Coste |
no
|
| Copyright |
sí
|
| Formatos |
application/pdf
|
| Requerimientos técnicos |
Browser: Any
|
| Relación |
[References] http://era.deedi.qld.gov.au/694/1/SmithFieldEvaluation-SEC.pdf
[References] http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA9960347
[References] http://era.deedi.qld.gov.au/694/
|
| Fecha de contribución |
19-oct-2009 |
| Contacto |
|
|
|
|
|
Valoración de los usuarios
No hay ninguna valoración para este recurso. Sea el primero en
valorar este recurso.
|
|
|
|
