<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/searchAutor.do?q=Maher,%20Michael%20J.">
    <title>Resultados de la búsqueda: Maher, Michael J.</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/searchAutor.do?q=Maher,%20Michael%20J.</link>
    <description>Resultados 1 - 10 de 135 de Maher, Michael J.. (0,12 segundos)</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
        <rdf:li />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:language>es</dc:language>
  </channel>
  
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=46911893">
    <title>Single Rules form Canonical Logic Programs</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=46911893</link>
    <description>It has been conjectured [Blair] that every definite clause logic program  containing exactly one rule is canonical. This note presents a simple proof  of this conjecture.</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Maher Ibm; Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=242860">
    <title>A Model-Theoretic Semantics for Defeasible Logic</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=242860</link>
    <description>Defeasible logic is an efficient logic for defeasible reasoning. It is
defined through a proof theory and, until now, has had no model theory. In this
paper a model-theoretic semantics is given for defeasible logic. The logic is
sound and complete with respect to the semantics. We also briefly outline how
this approach extends to a wide range of defeasible logics.</description>
    <dc:creator>Maher, Michael J.</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=562531">
    <title>Propositional Defeasible Logic has Linear Complexity</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=562531</link>
    <description>Defeasible logic is a rule-based nonmonotonic logic, with both strict and
defeasible rules, and a priority relation on rules. We show that inference in
the propositional form of the logic can be performed in linear time. This
contrasts markedly with most other propositional nonmonotonic logics, in which
inference is intractable.</description>
    <dc:creator>Maher, Michael J.</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41843119">
    <title>A Logic Programming View of CLP</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41843119</link>
    <description>We address the problem of lifting definitions, results, and even proofs for
the theory of logic programming, so that they apply to constraint logic programming
(CLP). We attempt to systematize this lifting, where it is possible,
and delineate where it is not possible. We show that the Independence of
Negated Constraints property of constraint domains is fundamental to several
different aspects of constraint logic programming. This is a principal
cause for the inability to lift some traditiona...</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41843762">
    <title>A CLP View of Logic Programming</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41843762</link>
    <description>. We address the problem of determining those constraint domains
A for which the traditional logic programming semantics and the constraint
logic programming semantics CLP (A) coincide. This reduces to a study of
non-standard models of Clark's axioms and the notion of solution compactness
introduced in the CLP scheme. The results of this study include the
proof of the existence of a free product in the class of algebras defined by
Clark's axioms, a characterization of when Clark's axioms form...</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41846941">
    <title>Constrained Dependencies</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41846941</link>
    <description>We extend the notions of functional and finiteness dependencies to apply to subsets of a relation that are specified by constraints. These dependencies have many applications. We are able to characterize those constraint domains which admit a polynomial time solution of the implication problem (assuming P/=NP) and give an efficient algorithm for these cases, modulo the cost of constraint manipulation. For other cases we offer approximate algorithms. Finally, we outline some applications of th...</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41846999">
    <title>Reasoning about Stable Models (and other Unstable Semantics)</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41846999</link>
    <description>The well-founded semantics and stable model semantics have proven popular
semantics for logic programs. However, these semantics (and others) are not directly
amenable to logical reasoning since logically equivalent logic programs may
have different stable or well-founded models. Many natural simplifications are not
universally valid. Furthermore, in some semantics -- including the stable model semantics
-- the definition of a new predicate in terms of old predicates can affect the
semantics ...</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41848754">
    <title>Representing Sets of Rational Trees Using Techniques of Non-Monotonic Reasoning</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41848754</link>
    <description>this paper our aim is to adapt and apply methods of giving semantics
to non-monotonic rule systems to the purpose of making new definitions
in an unestablished area. Inasmuch as we maximize predicate extensions
and have different motivations from non-monotonic reasoning, this work can
serve as a guiding example in the development of more abstract notions of
non-monotonic rule systems, as begun in [19].</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41849527">
    <title>Adding Constraints to Logic-based Formalisms</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=41849527</link>
    <description>Constraints are predefined relations with a special implementation mechanism.
Logic formalisms provide specific reasoning facilities. We look at the
effect of adding constraints to existing logic-based executable formalisms, focussing
on the semantics of the combined formalisms. We find that in cases
where this has been successful the operations of the formalism can be formulated
logically and then extended easily to constraints. In many cases a
disjunctive property of the constraints is refl...</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=42030963">
    <title>Single Rules form Canonical Logic Programs</title>
    <link>http://biblioteca.universia.net/ficha.do?id=42030963</link>
    <description>It has been conjectured [Blair] that every definite clause logic program
containing exactly one rule is canonical. This note presents a simple proof
of this conjecture.</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael J. Maher</dc:creator>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>


